No. 24-6874

In Re Robert D. Batson

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-03-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure constitutional-rights due-process eleventh-circuit mandamus pro-se-litigant
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2025-05-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

I.
WHETHER ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL HAS
CREATED LOCAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE THAT
ARBITRARILY AND UNREASONABLY ENCROACHED UPON THE
PERSONAL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF PRO SE LITIGANTS
AND RUN AFOUL OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEE OF
ACCESS TO THE COURTS AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW AS
SECURED BY THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO
THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

II.
WHETHER CLERK OF COURT AND STAFF ATORNEY
ERRONEOUSLY APPLIED ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF
APPEAL LOCAL RULES IN A MANNER INCONSISTENT WITH
FEDERAL LAW WARRRANTING MANDAMUS AND INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE THEREWITH.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has created local rules that arbitrarily encroach upon pro se litigants' rights and violate constitutional due process guarantees

Docket Entries

2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-02-28
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 28, 2025)

Attorneys

Robert Batson
Robert Darrel Batson — Petitioner