No. 24-6868
IFP
Tags: antiterrorism-act evidentiary-law federal-court habeas-corpus state-sovereignty tenth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-04-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a federal court violates the Tenth Amendment by commandeering
state evidentiary law and adding a heightened provision for the admissibility of
defense evidence to deny habeas relief, and where the State has expressly rejected
the federal provision in question.
2. Whether and to what extent the restrictions of Title I of the Antiterrorism
and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 apply to habeas petitions filed as original
matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal court violates the Tenth Amendment by commandeering state evidentiary law and adding a heightened provision for the admissibility of defense evidence to deny habeas relief, and where the State has expressly rejected the federal provision in question
Docket Entries
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-11
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
James Eric Mansfield
James Eric Mansfield — Petitioner