No. 24-6860

Mitchell S. Sanderson v. Kari Agotness, Judge, District Court of North Dakota, Northeast Judicial District Five

Lower Court: North Dakota
Docketed: 2025-03-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-law due-process judicial-immunity judicial-misconduct oath-of-office supremacy-clause
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2025-05-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether a County District Judge can ignore/violate the Rules of Court ?

Weather a County District Judge can ignore/violate Judicial Canons ?

Weather a County District Judge can ignore/violate State laws ?

Weather a County District Judge can ignore/violate Federal laws ?

Weather a County District Judge can ignore/violate Constitutional laws ?

Whether a County District Judge can ignore/violate their Oath of Office ?

Weather a County District Judge can ignore/violate Due Process ?

Weather a County District Judge can ignore/violate the Supremacy Clause ?

Weather a County District Judge can ignore/violate Proper Service rules ?

Weather a County District Judge can allow a Defendant to file the Summons and Complaint to initiate a case?

Weather a County District Judge can award excessive attorney fees for a simple dismissal without a hearing on the Merits?

Weather a County District Judge can ignore/violate the Oath of Office, Constitution, Federal laws, State law, U.S. Supreme Court case law, Federal appellant court case law, North Dakota Supreme Court case law and have immunity !

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a County District Judge can systematically ignore or violate multiple legal standards and constitutional protections

Docket Entries

2025-05-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/22/2025.
2025-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 25, 2025)

Attorneys

Mitchell S. Sanderson
Mitchell S. Sanderson — Petitioner