No. 24-6859

Cecil Ray v. Angela Phams, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Georgia
Docketed: 2025-03-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment right-to-counsel state-courts
Latest Conference: 2025-05-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. IS one merits bond appeal exist and are much invalidated by a State Court as review, should Federal Court address one lack KH as a second of Unt cost Ney AWE Sket counk Xe osstsa hein Whe claims one atopalhe \neSene dering, ot, Manissina, a Seek Welotvs Conges and CenkBtcoke K tededde Coose atlic® hoo U.S. Fourkeentn Ancudancnt clelm apd io 28 6.4.08 183 Ch) cAcien kok ke gperiiontR wes compledely Aented access No counk Yeonserighs on ol appecls Son vhe Stoke?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Georgia State Courts violated the petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by denying access to case records for direct appeal purposes

Docket Entries

2025-05-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/22/2025.
2024-09-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 25, 2025)

Attorneys

Cecil Ray
Cecil Ray — Petitioner