No. 24-6850
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief sixth-amendment strickland-standard
Latest Conference:
2025-04-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the state appellate court misapplied this Court's prejudice standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), when affirming the denial of Petitioner Moran's claim that his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to present exculpatory evidence at trial.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state appellate court misapplied the Strickland prejudice standard when affirming the denial of Petitioner Moran's ineffective assistance of counsel claim
Docket Entries
2025-04-28
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.
2025-04-01
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2025-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 24, 2025)
Attorneys
Philip Jude Moran
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
State of Florida
Trisha Meggs Pate — Office of the Attorney General , Respondent