No. 24-676
Friends of George's, Inc. v. Steven J. Mulroy, in His Official and Individual Capacity as the District Attorney General of Shelby County, Tennessee
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: article-iii-standing content-based-restriction first-amendment judicial-review statutory-interpretation viewpoint-discrimination
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
FirstAmendment Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
When evaluating a constitutional challenge to a state statute, may a federal court unilaterally narrow the statute's scope in a manner that contradicts the statutory text and is neither dictated nor authorized by decisions of the state's highest court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When evaluating a constitutional challenge to a state statute, may a federal court unilaterally narrow the statute's scope in a manner that contradicts the statutory text and is neither dictated nor authorized by decisions of the state's highest court?
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-22
Waiver of Steven J. Mulroy of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-22
Waiver of right of respondent Steven J. Mulroy to respond filed.
2024-12-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2025)
Attorneys
Friends of George's, Inc.
Gregory M. Lipper — Lipper Law PLLC, Petitioner
Steven J. Mulroy
James Matthew Rice — Office of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent