1. Is there a violation of Act 3, § 2, ¶ 13 and the Byprovement of the Federal Constitution by Convict and Sentence A defendant PETITIONER FOR AN WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Never Genuinely Tested the State for District of the Alleged Offenses, in which she was Tried, Convicted, and Sentenced? And does not these Constitutional violations.

2. Why is PETITIONER A Beneficiary A Writ to Fonda PETITIONER be imprisoned for 1-1 years in a Pennsylvania State Prison, but Upon A Conviction And Sentence false has the Right Are Not in the Judge to Render Ore this be the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedures me Tate es obi a Inineenreerini Siiiglein nies enislnted foe Assuap Uont by State of Criminal and civil jurisdiction of the 500 Creek and Nile, we RY Paina Convouties ictal bod nc ey se

3. How can PETITIONER be required to Exhaust State remedies poke None the None (26 USCS) 2954 UCD EB) And pocong to the Teanphin Constitution. le ARK 5 iocey, "All 1005 Shall be Suspended to the extent Hust they nee inconsistent VU Vrdes "prescribed Yuden The Constitbehioileny AS Seek, does nok the Renna Concstitretion. Conf let wok Ue US Constitrchionl's ight te" bees Ine Process of Leo'of dhe Spr Anienddments? And does Suede conPlict OARRANE Pelitioniee "Exceptibual Cigeunistances" to, aohy habeas Coepus relief, in te Absence of exkinsbad?

4. Does PETITIONER lurve gfouns be eerde kee procedural defrrlts, dye Ww Yee" CfiSe Anis pepibice" Daedvine, Yelaling fo The Trin Binge having {a SivANical Inbevesl ini Pelibisner!s sob Cokie ts a AM Anienduert. iolation)) OK KAS Pelibonier's nudter been exkincted by Yee. Conurinnoe | OF Pensilvtains when the Reaver Crvernon's a of the General Counsel "provided A" lea No Achion." feller to the MPREC Wibal Government rokich was'dedeemined As A'fixal Adgidiendion Ua ts Subject te Arieinl Review, IN.AecoRDANICe to Z'Pe Con Sta. 1613.

Whether a state court prisoner can seek habeas corpus relief under federal law when state remedies have not been fully exhausted and extraordinary circumstances are alleged