No. 24-6725
Fernando Yates v. Spring Independent School District
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2025-03-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Where the Fifth Court of Appeals erred in ignoring relevant evidence, and failed to properly consider the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Amicus Brief?
Where the Civil Rights of Petitioner violated?
Where attorneys are allowed to use sworn perjured evidence to win a case?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Court of Appeals erred in ignoring relevant evidence and failing to properly consider the EEOC Amicus Brief, and whether the petitioner's civil rights were violated by attorneys using sworn perjured evidence
Docket Entries
2025-07-31
Case considered closed.
2025-03-31
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 21, 2025, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2025-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2025.
2025-03-10
Waiver of Spring Independent School District of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-10
Waiver of right of respondent Spring Independent School District to respond filed.
2024-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 9, 2025)
Attorneys
Fernando Yates
Fernando Yates — Petitioner
Spring Independent School District
Christopher Blewer Gilbert — Thompson & Horton LLP, Respondent