Whether a sentencing judge may impose a condition of supervised release that substantially restricts a defendant's access to his own children without finding that the defendant poses a risk of harm to his children.

Whether a district court may impose a condition of supervision that severely limits a defendant's access to his children in circumstances where the district court expressly finds it does not know whether the restriction is "doing more harm than good."

Whether a sentencing judge may impose a condition of supervised release that requires a defendant found guilty of possessing child pornography not involving his children to obtain a probation officer's prior approval for any contact or association with his own children without first finding that the defendant poses a risk of harm to his children, especially where the defendant has never directly abused any child nor injured his own children nor engaged in any criminal or other harmful conduct with any of them.

Whether a federal district court's compassionate release order can be appealed after the defendant has been released from custody