No. 24-6661
Corey Dequan Broome v. James R. Scheibner, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability certiorari judicial-precedent sixth-circuit statutory-interpretation vacate-and-remand
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-03-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE SIXIH CIRCUIT'S DENIAL OF PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY REFLECTS A DEVIATION FOR THE DIRECTIVE
SET FORTH BY THE COURTS PRECEDENT, NECESSITATING THE COURT EMPLOY ITS
POWER AND GRANT CERTIORARI, VACATE AND REMAND UNDER TITLE 28 U.S.C. §2106?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit's denial of petitioner's motion for certificate of appealability deviates from the court's precedent, warranting certiorari, vacate, and remand under 28 U.S.C. §2106
Docket Entries
2025-03-31
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2025.
2025-03-12
Waiver of right of respondent James R. Scheibner, Warden to respond filed.
2024-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 31, 2025)
2024-11-12
Application (24A458) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until December 16, 2024.
2024-10-28
Application (24A458) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 6, 2024 to December 16, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Corey Dequan Broome
Corey Dequan Broome — Petitioner
James R. Scheibner, Warden
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent