WHETHER A FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGE DID NOT ALLOW PETITIONER MEHTA ; AS A PRO-SE ATTORNEY TO REPRESENTED ON HIS BEHALF AND DEPRIVED JUSTICE :

(A) 8 FEDERAL RULES 4 (D) ALLOWES TO SERVE " WAIVER OF SUMMONS " TO DEFENDANTS AND IT HAS BEEN SERVED UPON MGM COUNSEL JASON SIFER ; WHO AGREED TO ACCEPT " WAIVER OF SUMMONS " AND FILED "APPERANCE " BEFORE THE COURT AND PLEADING OF A" MOTION TO DISMISS " WHICH WAS HEARD IN ABSENT OF" ORAL ARGUMENTS " AND PETITIONER MEHTA WAS ALLOWED TO FILE HIS " AMENDED COMPLAINT " ALONG WITH NEW ADDED PARTIES by MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND SERVED SIMILARLY « WAIVERS OF SUMMONS "TO DEFENDANTS AND NEW PLEADING OF « MOTION TO DISMISS " FILED.

(B) Thereafter; NEWLY APPOINTED Hon. FEDERAL JUDGE CHRISTINA SILVA DISMISS THE ENTIRED SIX COUNTS COMPLAINT STATING THAT PETITIONER HAS FAILED TO SERVED SUMMONS TO DEFENDANTS.

(C) IS IT SHE PREJUDICED TOWARD PRO-SE ATTORNEY ? OR IS SHE IGNORE FEDERAL RULES COMPILED AS A FEDERAL CIVIL RULES PROCEDURE OR BOTH. Or FAVORED THE LICENSE ATTORNEY INSTEAD OF " FAIR DETERMINATION OF ISSUES AS PRESENTED " OR " CONFLICT OF INTEREST" WHILE 2 OTHER JUDGES DID NOT PARTICIPATED IN THIS CASE. AS MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL GOVERN ENTIRED LASVEGAS.

(D) AND SHE VIOLATED PETITIONER 6th AMENDMENT OF US CONSTITUTION AND VIOLATED EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE WHERE PETITIONER WAS NOT ALLOWED FOR ORAL ARGUMENTS AS FILED MANY MOTIONS BEFORE THE COURTS AND SANCTIONS AND DISHONESTY OF COUNSEL IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL RULE 11.

(E) And She violated DUE PROCESS CLAUSE AS GUARANTEE IN THE US CONSTITUTION.

(F) United States Constitution are important federal questions and require an interpretation of the Constitution that the Supreme Court may wish to weigh in on for their correctness and application.

(G) The case could have national significance

(H) Now ; Feb 18th US APPEAL COURT AWARDED ATTORNEYS FEES; IS ABSURD . THIS COURT HAS TO CORRECT IT; INCLUDING FEDERAL JUDGE AWARDING $20,000 ATTORNEYS FEES.

(I) WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Appellees Park MGM, LLC, Ann Hoff, London Swinney, William Hornbuckle, Joseph Corbo, Jr., and Ryan Guardiz are entitled to attorney 's fees on appeal. The motion for attorney 's fees (Docket Entry No. 61) is granted. The determination of an appropriate amount of fees is referred to Appellate Commissioner Lisa B. Fitzgerald, who has authority to conduct whatever proceedings she deems appropriate and to enter an order awarding fees subject to reconsideration by the panel. See 9th Cir. R. 39-1.9

[ J.] US CONSTITUTION EQUAL GUARANTEE PROTECTION CLAUSE AND "DUE PROCESS " GUARANTEED BY US CONSTITUTION IS NOT ONLY VIOLATED; BUT " MIS

Question not identified.