^-ec> IdcdtS 6^ cP -fir- +hjum)d<5^ X05 -VW
DOtfdoo^ 6 f P^n/T^U^o/c ■ On Mi da^L,J -fimt in error,\,

2. IM 0 4-W UrC,4c6 S-Mes c5 1 isMr? cJ- Co^rc-l-
00» d^U- dnrW/cJ' g-f Panny^luCn'/c.
In no+ dt-fv-ull jadjm*/^ und<u~ fcdosai
R<->lt of c}^}/ PmQicfaoe-&hu(yc i'P# d'f&otck&n

3- ^ 1 d 4-\VL Dr)dt6 Sd*\-tr Q'lTsdrxci- CaurX i^n ~MjL
/4 s dricrriior lfVMc)c)U D'/crbncP of pw ci
Ct*J-k of Couri- AO-f 6u{&ul4 Jad<ym<y74
-VU«V if Gu-bmabtc under /edej^/ fdoLv a( c)<j) /
ffbUL&Urt- rcgcoJinj Go dey r<Jlx_ <3^ Senj/csL af
Gneusir -b C0fHpti>n4- under- Puit y(j) af
w>U-r of owlu cm

b"t

p^ti(xdurt .

4. b) 2> D\ sMnoJ" Jlsd^t^ oh
) n <3 cn i( j n § 40
k£ri M <icV-A,;^ £ er-bnj-o-f )<ubhh)r JliSCrcJio*
67/1 tv/dtji'hrL,usr

lu / "M? L> ■/-0^
MjunX S'

Did -Mu. DW4rioD JLrd^ ■ (j^u-<TC htS discredits
Pn'Sisnsur/ftfjJiGnJLrS cJrims bd/J^5,
\ A (3 1 S yvi 1 if s' ! nprtjvdi Cc
as ^fl^<U_r is SlHlllo CAfirfe5y <rf Ptfnn4cnJ-/£nrp,r 1 3

Whether the District Court improperly exercised discretion in denying default judgment under federal civil procedure rules