1. IS my wife Marta Jo life more important then JURISDICTION?

(A) PETITIONER STAMPONE SAYS N.O.
(B) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF NEWARK, N.J SAYS YES.
(C) U.S. COURT OF APPEALS THIRD CIRCUIT SAYS YES.
(D) U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 3RD CIRCUIT REHEARING SAYS YES.

2. Does THIS CASE HAVE MERIT?

(A) PETITIONER STAMPONE SAYS YES.
(B) U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF NEWARK, N.J. MAGISTRATE JUDGE SAYS THIS CASE HAS MERIT DURING THE FIRST PHONE CONFERENCE. (SEE RECORDING OF FIRST PHONE CONFERENCE)

3. WAS MARTA JO COMPETIVE, ALERT, ORIENTED AND ABLE TO MAKE HER OWN DECISIONS ON AND AFTER AUG 05, 2020?

(A) PETITIONER STAMPONE SAYS YES.
(B) DEFENDANT JUDGE DAVID M. MURKOWSKI IN COMPLAINT SAYS NO.
(C) SLOAN KETTERING (ONE OF THE BEST HOSPITAL IN THE WORLD) SAYS YES. (SEE MARTA'S MEDICAL REPORT IN COMPLAINT.)
(D) MAYO CLINIC (ONE OF THE BEST HOSPITAL IN THE WORLD) SAYS YES. (SEE MARTA'S MEDICAL RECORDS IN EXHIBITS OF COMPLAINT AND EXHIBIT IV IN THIS PETITION.)
(E) STATE JUDGE JOSEPH R. KLEIN SAID BOTH MARTA JO AND PETITIONER STAMPONE ARE COMPETENT ENOUGH TO BE MARRIED ON SEPTEMBER 9, 2020. (SEE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE/LICENSE IN COMPLAINT EXHIBITS.)

4. WAS MARTA JO AND PETITIONER STAMPONE DEPRIVED OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?

(A) PETITIONER SAYS YES.
(B) U.S. DISTRICT COURT DID NOT MAKE A DECISION ON THIS.
(C) U.S. COURT OF APPEALS DID NOT MAKE A DECISION ON THIS.
(D) U.S. COURT OF APPEALS DID NOT MAKE A DECISION ON THIS.

5. WHAT DEFENDANTS HAVE A MORAL OBLIGATION AND/OR FIDUCIARY DUTY TO HELP MARTA FINISH HER CANCER?

(A) PETITIONER SAYS ALL.
(B) U.S. DISTRICT COURT DID NOT MAKE A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE.
(C) U.S. COURT OF APPEALS DID NOT MAKE A DECISION ON THIS.
(D) U.S. COURT OF APPEALS REHEARING DID NOT MAKE A DECISION.

6. WHAT DEFENDANTS ARE DIRECTLY O/L INDIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NEGLIGENT DISREGARD OF EXTREME CRUELTY, ELDER ABUSE CRULE AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT THAT LED TO THE WRONGFUL DEATH OF MY WIFE MARTA JO STAMPONE?

(A) BOTH PLAINTIFFS MARTA JO AND FREDERICK STAMPONE CLEARLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL IN THEIR COMPLAINT HOW EACH DEFENDANT WAS DIRECTLY O/L INDIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE.
(B) U.S

Whether the U.S. Supreme Court should review a case involving alleged constitutional rights violations and medical negligence related to cancer treatment