Capital Case. Questions presented where The Judge is wrong:
This was supposed to have been a human rights defender who
protect and defend the human rights of all human beings: Were
these ethical dissents? The court erred considering that I brought
an injunctive relief team to the judge that instead chose to insult
me more than ten times on the record (Which I objected to the
defamation)? Is it their first time as an injunctive relief team
representing the United States being the defendant? That 's a
Pandora 's Box of litigation considering these guys can sign for
anything yet are representing the United States instead of it being
a request for an injunctive relief where the United States is not
being sued (is this suddenly an oligarch)? There 's the Government
Accountability Office Injunctive Relief & The Department Oi
Justice Commercial Litigants Injunctive Relief? Considering an
injunctive relief is to sign protection for oil companies foi
example to bring back home oil for Americans? Was it patriarchal
judicial collusion? Victim criminalization? Can you see all the
papers? One has a timestamp that shows it was received 3 months
earlier although never docketed until after the case got closed
which the judge mentions as the reason for the dismissal? That 's
not my fault that 's their clerks fault or whoever did that? (I called
the scotus clerk ahead to ask whether I should ask about subject
matter jurisdiction or diversity jurisdiction question for questions
presented [I counted everything too I typed it's around 1300 words
instead of the 1500 limit.]).

Were the judicial proceedings fundamentally unfair due to alleged judicial misconduct and procedural irregularities in an injunctive relief case involving potential government accountability issues?