Whether the D.C. Court of Appeals erred by affirming the pre-trial denial of Mr. Atchinson's necessity defense, which was supported by expert testimony, in a non-jury trial, in a nonviolent civil disobedience action addressing the existential threat of global climate change, thereby violating his constitutional right to present a complete defense.

Whether the D.C. Court of Appeals erred by affirming the pre-trial denial of Mr. Atchinson's necessity defense in a nonviolent civil disobedience action addressing global climate change