No. 24-66
United States, ex rel. Dana Johnson v. Raytheon Company
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights due-process government-contractor judicial-review national-security standing whistleblower
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the standard in Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518 (1988) precludes a private-sector whistleblower case.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the standard in Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518 (1988) precludes a private-sector whistleblower case
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2024-09-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 19, 2024)
2024-06-20
Application (23A1110) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until July 17, 2024.
2024-06-10
Application (23A1110) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 17, 2024 to July 17, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor. (Justice Alito is recused.)
Attorneys
Dana Johnson
Brian P. Sanford — The Sanford Firm, Petitioner
Raytheon Company
Jonathan M. Freiman — Wiggin & Dana LLP, Respondent