No. 24-6595
Martin Guadalupe Cardiel-Ruiz v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-appeal collateral-attack due-process immigration-law judicial-review removal-proceedings
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Under Mendoza-Lopez, does a defendant satisfy § 1326(d)(1) (requiring only the exhaustion of "available" administrative remedies) and § 1326(d)(2) (requiring a deprivation of the opportunity for judicial review) when the defendant's waiver of their right to appeal their removal proceeding was not considered and intelligent?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant satisfies 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d)(1)-(2) when their removal order appeal waiver was not considered and intelligent
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-02-25
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 21, 2025)
Attorneys
Martin Guadalupe Cardiel-Ruiz
Steven Joseph Koeninger — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent