Congress enacted 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Blessing v. Freestone, 520 U.S. 329 (1997) to hold state actors accountable for violating federal constitutional and statutory rights 5th Amendments and 14 Amendments and 8th Amendment Constitutional Violations. Why Congress did not, however, specify every rule governing claims filed under Section 1983 why Agencies have continued to violate Due Process Rights. Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a federal district court had equal or concurrent jurisdiction with state probate (will) courts over tort claims under state common law. N.C.G.S. § 29-14. Share of surviving spouse, (c) When equitable distribution of property is awarded to the surviving spouse pursuant to G.S. 50-20 subsequent to the death of the decedent, the share of the surviving spouse determined under subsections (a) and (b) of this section shall be first determined as though no property had been awarded to the surviving spouse pursuant to N.C.G.S. 50-20 subsequent to the death of the decedent, and then reduced by the net value of the marital estate awarded to the surviving spouse pursuant to G.S. 50-20 subsequent to the death of the decedent. (1959, c. 879, s. 1; 1979, c. 186, s. 1; 1981, c. 69; 1995, c. 262, s. 3; 2001-364, s. 6; 2012-71, s. 1.) Intestate Succession Act was violated. Swift v. Tyson, 41 U.S. (16 Pet.) 1 (1842)as a means

Rehabilitation Act and Inmate Rights: The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, particularly Section 504, protects the rights of disabled individuals, including inmates. This act ensures that no qualified individual with a disability is excluded from, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance within Judicial forum of arbitration. The 5th Amendment was stopped by an agency. Inmates have certain due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, which includes protections against arbitrary denial.

Non-judicial appearance for not -yet-to be assert -entry of Equitable Distribution pursuant North Carolina extensive statutory procedure within the subject to Marital Property 14th Amendment Due Process protection and 5th Amendment were Constitutional Violations. Chapter 50 § 50-20. N.C.G.S. Distribution by court of marital and divisible property, (a) Upon application of a party, the court shall determine what is the marital property within state statute that within federal jurisdiction of adopting state Laws 28 USC 1652, Erie Railroad Company v. Tompkins 304 U.S. 64 (1938). Judiciary Act of 1789, section 34 ("Rules of Decision Act") (28 U.S.C. § 1652)

Can a court deny Breach of Fiduciary Duties and conversion within bounds of Law provide fair procedures, life" and property. Motion to Reinstate a Complaint liberties " that violates or abridge the privileges or immunities 14th Amendment and 5th Amendment ignored and placed in vanilla court file that was identified as miscarriage of justice.

Due Process protection reflect on Local Rule 40(b) Conflict of United States

Can a court deny Equitable Distribution and violate Due Process Rights under the 5th and 14th Amendments?