No. 24-6560

Tamaz Pasternak, aka Tomas Pasternak v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-law federal-statute fraud-scheme property-deception statutory-interpretation wire-fraud
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-05-29 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether a scheme to induce a transaction in property through deception, but which contemplates no harm to any property interest, constitutes a scheme to defraud under the federal wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, the question presented in Kousisis v. United States, No. 23–909 (U.S.) (cert. granted June 17, 2024; argued Dec. 9, 2024).

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a scheme to induce a transaction in property through deception, but which contemplates no harm to any property interest, constitutes a scheme to defraud under the federal wire fraud statute

Docket Entries

2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-17
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2025-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 17, 2025)

Attorneys

Tamaz Pasternak, aka Tomas Pasternak
Daniel George HabibFederal Defenders of New York, Inc., Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent