1- Did the New Hampshire Supreme Court misapprehend the two-part test
for federal due process jurisdiction is a way to determine if a state court
can exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant? The test
is based on the idea that a defendant must have minimum contacts with
the state and it must be reasonable to require them to defend the lawsuit.

2- By misapprehending the two-part test for federal due process jurisdiction,
did the New Hampshire Supreme Court deny the Petitioner his right for
due process?

Did the New Hampshire Supreme Court misapprehend the two-part test for federal due process jurisdiction in determining personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant?