1) Is a State Courts Subject Matter Jurisdiction REALLY NECESSARY and imprison a defendant?

2) Can a State Court Arbitrarily deprive a defendant of the State Const,codes and defining case law to get and/or keep a conviction?

If lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction on a Trial Court conviction is discovered and challenged years later shouldnt the State Court atleast review the claim?

4) Why does the Texas Justice system reward prosecutors and "State Bar" defense Attorneys who hide evidence of a courts lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction years later by denying to review it or denying the writ for procedural issues?

5) Will the United States Supreme Court allow a State Courts illegal conviction acqured without Subject Matter Jurisdiction to stand?to convict

Whether a state court can arbitrarily deprive a defendant of constitutional rights by maintaining a conviction without subject matter jurisdiction