1. Did Justice Gorsuch's dissenting opinion in Cunningham v. Florida establish a new precedent that requires retroactive application, or is it a reminder of an existing constitutional principle state courts must honor, and if so, can a violation of the people's power to reverse their own practices be raised at any time under a writ of habeas corpus?

2. Does Florida's standard jury instructions insert the material page to part the province of the justice they abridge the defendants Sixth Amendment rights to a jury trial?

3. Did the Judicial branch abrogation of the jury penalty instruction law violate Separation of Powers and/or invalidate the constitutional adequate of the reduced size six-person jury law in cases that divest the Judge of sentencing matters on?

4. Does a State court violate the Sixth amendment when it instructs the jury for the purpose of discouraging the pardon powers, especially when misinforming them on the judges sentencing discretion when mandatory minimum sentences apply? See Rule 3.10 By, is it the Judge's job to determine a proper sentence if the defendant?

5. Was the State appellate Court's refusal to certify the question of law presented a denial of due process of law guaranteed under the 14th Amendment? Cunningham v.?

Whether the Florida Supreme Court's jury instructions and sentencing practices violate the Sixth Amendment and due process rights, and can such constitutional violations be raised under habeas corpus