Does law enforcement quasi-legal representations that a truth verification machine is 100% accurate, combined with numerous acts of deception during a police interrogation including minimization of Miranda warnings, implied promises of lenience combined with implied threats for not cooperating with law enforcement all made to a suspect that is under stress and fatigued render the resulting confession involuntary under this Court's totality of the circumstances analysis of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments?

Whether law enforcement quasi-legal representations about a truth verification machine's accuracy, combined with deceptive interrogation tactics and minimization of Miranda warnings, render a confession involuntary under the totality of the circumstances analysis of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments