DID THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, WHEN ISSUING ITS OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. HITE, 769 F.3d 1154 (D.C. C . Cir. 2014) CREATE A CONFLICT WITH THE OPINION ISSUED BY THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT IN UNITED STATES V. MURRELL, 368 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2004) ?

1) DOES THES CONFLICT ADDRESSED ABOVE CREATED A SCENARIO'WHERE A DEFENDANT [VV lMAYDBEI FOUND GUILTY OF A VIOLATION OF A FEDERAL STATUTE IN THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT WITHOUT PROOF OR PLEADING OF AN ELEMENT REQUIRED IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT FOR A VIOLATION OF THE' SAME STATUTE?

DID THE COURT OF APPEALS FORTHEDELEVENTH CIRCUIT, WHEN ISSUEING THE OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. LEE, 603 F.3d 904 (11th Cir. 2010) CREATE AN INNER_CIRCUIT CONFLICT, SUSEPTABLE TO THE SAME HAZARD AS SUGGESTED IN QUESTION 2 ABOVE?

2) ARE THE CONFLICTS ASSERTED ABOVE "REAL AND EMBARASSING, " WARRANTING THE EXERCISE OF THIS COURT'S DISCRETION TO GRANT AN EXTRAORDINARY :WRIT TO RESOLVE SUCH CONFLICT(S)?

Whether the Court of Appeals created a circuit conflict regarding the elements of a federal statute requiring proof or pleading of specific elements