Whether the U.S. District Court abused its discretion in dismissing petitioner's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 petitions as untimely prior to ruling on the merits of petitioner's substantive rights claims in violation of the rule of timeliness when proof exists that her claims establish a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome of the trial and whether petitioner's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated.

Whether the District Court imposed its discretion in dismissing petitioner's motion for a new trial or stay of execution and whether petitioner's unpredictable tolling relief as provided by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (Habeas Corpus Review) is petitioner has been denied a fair federal review of her federal U.S. Constitutional rights unlawfully.

Whether the U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the District Court's rulings on the merits and whether the District Court's rulings of untimeliness without going into the merits and claims were unlawful as a time bar procedure was misconstrued as well as unlawful applied AEDPA.

Whether the District Court improperly denied Petitioner's federal habeas corpus claims and violated due process rights by failing to conduct a substantive review of constitutional claims