No. 24-6483
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: case-management court-procedure docket-numbering judicial-administration legal-documentation procedural-uniformity
Latest Conference:
2025-06-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
My o|ooUe^r wth the, dishncf courf- was
Upda+ed and labeled witV\ sequential
numbers- I ha, docket I had w)rHa coaH of
appacjs i/Jas hct tin&li-z_ed or designated
"ft 4h|& Same, manner or chronological
^°dus operand^ . Wihy?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court's docket numbering process violates procedural uniformity or chronological standards
Docket Entries
2025-06-16
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-05-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-04-16
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-03-31
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2025.
2025-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2024-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 7, 2025)
Attorneys
California
Thomas Stuart Patterson — Office of the CA Atty. General, Respondent
Schelton Jones
Schelton Jones — Petitioner