Charlene A. Greene-Rodriguez v. Puerto Rico Department of Education, et al.
DueProcess
1. Can the Judiciary of Puerto Rico, its Supreme Court, deprive the petitioner, a U.S. citizen who has been rightfully requesting reinstatement to her tenured job, of due process of law by denying equal protection of the laws and issuing decisions in judgments and resolutions without basing them on the Constitution of the United States of America and the Ninth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment Section One of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States of America, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico?
2. Does the Constitution of the United States of America, through the Ninth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment Section One of the Bill of Rights, protects tenure law for school principals and teachers and solving the petitioner's conflict, granting the due process of law and be reinstated to her permanent and career position and property R-02120 as school principal at Salvador Fuentes Valentin High School in Aguadilla and that her benefits and record clearance are reinstated as they were before the transgressing of her constitutional rights, to receive duplicity of her salary for the years waiting for her reinstallation as stipulated in the regulations of the Department of Education in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and any other benefit granted by the Department of Education since the year 2014 to the present as this is a matter in the Constitution of the United States of America?
Can the Judiciary of Puerto Rico deprive a U.S. citizen of due process by denying equal protection and issuing decisions without basing them on the U.S. Constitution's Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments?