a cVxnp/\ 4rUe. principle. -lluxA C\
on AUe uncarrobara-t^d -te.s4t
Cour4A rt(jt i in
COAtyicVion C-ann^l be. bad
o4 an accomplrcet Kv\c.»a y
sec oc c»a %3vH-<4-g; Anal
4a!\e<J 4o gi^d +L4 invvruetton M 4ke conclusion
oA AWd jury cWarjt And Htmln^'S CauASel rc5^C t/ed
otyec-tfon tor appeal AKa4 4kd Anal Courts failure 4o
charge as rd^ues4^d retires rei/crsai 4UiS
TWe imajori4y opinion Ignores bo+k
import and affl.caWe principle 4 U* and n Key
il^erencc bc4u,e€n +(Vri Case and ike CO^d.cWs C^eJn^ <Un.
^jor-,4, opinio/, W£«U S 4ke i+^u4^ Prfrttfpltf on whfcK
r <mir>^5 4o charge \5 based I The phrasing <?| 4he
m-y.ri+y opinion's holding and 4he phrasing In -J^lns , do vhW
+6 -Vne Srta-Vulory principle in «ld e-f which Vhe revested ch
should he 4he fna>r, +y holds 4ka+ ikerc is no ntgj |
* <™*e. U)Vere 4ke S+ade relief on odber e^We , IncUl
4e4eA<UnVs CervPeSVw* a Dari ii fTht c*w cl+ti in • < , > fe *'Can*l~e
toV <\w x , ^ 'Wl*5We aMI ^ ^ (IW vWse Jdill) (Hid) ujhere 4bis Cff«r4 held 4UiV 4u cW,
required because (f 4K
Iht majority opinion in -Vhls cast broaiem 4\e Scope <4 4h*
evidence Uilnich obmdeS 4he need -for 4heo ,Vy ehcL $rotn
■" <hW u)Hrt«*e6 -Vo 4b
OWdo* V.S+A+e Il>h Qia hP 310ConViCMon ,an
Ary€
or
n3 A
ums k\o4
Were £-(W u/i+AesVS lo 4ke Cr?m^ ; ere
€ CHvnd 4a olk*r -em'd^ce 11
_ 5E <?d 3.31 CH15),
M+ach* £6 4K< lury Xri*Ci4Ct;M,c«iki'

Whether the trial court's failure to provide a requested jury instruction on an accomplice's testimony requires reversal of a criminal conviction when the majority opinion broadens the scope of evidence and ignores applicable legal principles