No. 24-6428
Marc Anthony Hill v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure cert-petition constitutional-adjudication direct-review judicial-mandate supreme-court-rule
Latest Conference:
2025-03-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether or not a petyirule announced by the Supreme Cpurt; applies to.petionter
,who N is currently on direct preview ayd ^ertioari, 'and where .-the lower courts
, on a, vacate and remand enters a new amended judgment before the final deposition
of the 'Supreme Courts Cert.,and declines to! recall their mandate in lighto
\ f., l
1
\ \
, * » ! -J \of this new rule announced, is in error., , which .violates basic 'norms of \ .
\ , /\
Constitutional Adjudication.\ \
I\ \
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a petitioner's direct review is impacted by a new Supreme Court rule when lower courts enter an amended judgment before the Supreme Court's final disposition of certiorari
Docket Entries
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-14
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2025)
Attorneys
Marc Anthony Hill
Marc Anthony Hill — Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent