No. 24-6408

Clinton Folkes v. South Carolina, et al.

Lower Court: South Carolina
Docketed: 2025-01-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-law equal-protection fourteenth-amendment legal-preservation retroactivity state-court
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of Equal Protection is violated when a state court conditions the retroactivity of a new rule of criminal law on whether a defendant preserves the error (i.e., the state court mandates the defendant make arguments based on law that did not exist at trial).

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of Equal Protection is violated when a state court conditions the retroactivity of a new rule of criminal law on whether a defendant preserves the error

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-31
Waiver of South Carolina, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent South Carolina, et al. to respond filed.
2024-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2025)

Attorneys

Clinton Folkes
Jason Scott LuckLuck VI, Ltd. Co., Petitioner
South Carolina, et al.
Joshua Abraham EdwardsSouth Carolina Office of the Attorney General, Respondent