No. 24-6394

In Re Saaed Moslem, et al.

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-01-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights judicial-fraud jury-instructions prosecutorial-misconduct statute-of-limitations writ-of-mandamus
Latest Conference: 2025-05-02
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Second Circuit's failure to address Petitioners' claims of prosecutorial misconduct and judicial fraud, despite multiple emergency motions, warrants this Court's intervention through a writ of mandamus?

Whether Petitioners' convictions were obtained in violation of the statute of limitations, given the government's reliance on time-barred evidence and the court's failure to properly instruct the jury on this issue?

Whether the jury instructions were fundamentally flawed and violated Petitioners' constitutional rights by omitting critical legal standards and failing to properly guide the jury's deliberations?

Whether the government and Second Circuit have continually obstructed Petitioners' efforts to expose the truth, necessitating this Court's intervention to ensure justice and maintain the integrity of the judicial system?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Second Circuit's failure to address Petitioners' claims of prosecutorial misconduct and judicial fraud warrants this Court's intervention through a writ of mandamus?

Docket Entries

2025-09-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-08-14
DISTRIBUTED.
2025-05-12
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-05-05
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/2/2025.
2025-01-31
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-08
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 26, 2025)

Attorneys

Saeed Moslem
Saeed Moslem — Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent