1. Whether victims of a state actor-led conspiracy to sell real property at an
undervalued price —without a forfeiture proceeding, yet proceeds of fraudulent
sale also seized thus defrauded —have a constitutional right to seek redress in
federal court for a violation of the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, under the
principles established in Tyler v. Hennepin Count}?

2. Whether, in light of Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB, Bounds v. Smith, and
other precedents, plaintiffs whose constitutional rights have been violated by
state actors(in a conspiracy to defraud) are entitled to seek a jury trial for
monetary damages und er federal law and Supreme Court case la w?

3. Whether federal courts are obligated to ensure the protection of substantive
rights, property rights including Equal Protection and Due Process, when state
courts(lncl state highest court in conflicts and retaliation) refuse to review or
provide relief from judicial/professional misconduct, as established in Marbury v.
Madison and Lane e Frank?

4. Whether, under the Marbury v. Madison doctrine, federal courts must review
constitutional violations and provide a forum for appeals, particularly when lower
courts refuse to hear or review constitutional claims in the context of state actor
misconduct?

Whether victims of state actor-led property fraud have a constitutional right to seek federal court redress for Fifth Amendment Takings Clause violations under Tyler v. Hennepin County precedent