No. 24-6366
Steven Douglas Freno, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 3553a-analysis appellate-review booker-standard gall-factors judicial-discretion sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference:
2025-03-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether, post- Booker and Gall, this Court should grant the Writ to provide clarity on an important, but unresolved area of law, to wit: whether appellate courts such as the P anel can completely dispense with analyzing the guidelines issue w here the District Court indicates it would have reached the same result by varying under Booker , Gall, and by applying the 3553 (a) factors?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether appellate courts can dispense with analyzing guideline issues when a district court would have reached the same result by varying under Booker and Gall
Docket Entries
2025-03-31
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2025.
2025-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2025)
Attorneys
Steven Freno
Rockne Cole — Cole Law Firm, PC, Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent