1. The Circuit Courts Three Judge panel created a conflict of grave importance warranting this court's discretionary judicial power when it denied petitioner's motion for rehearing en banc and cited that the petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the Full court, yet never stated why the petition was being denied?

2. Did the Circuit Court's three judge panel infringe upon the denial of petitioner's sixth amendment right to a trial by jury, treat me unfair and further subject petitioner to collateral consequences in accepting the trial Court's use of petitioner's 2010 "Alford Plea" conviction to enhance and sentence petitioner as a career offender, adverse to this court's ruling in Skidmore v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 13 (2008)?

Whether the Circuit Courts' three-judge panel created a conflict of grave importance by denying petitioner's en banc rehearing and potentially infringing upon the petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury through an Alford plea conviction enhancement