Q1- Does the exercise of judicial discretion violate constitutional guarantees such as due process, equal protection, impartiality, and the right to a jury trial?

Q2- Does enforcing non-legislative private procedural rules under the guise of inherent authority and Judicial discretion violate First Amendment protections?

Q3 - Does punishing a Party using claimed inherent judicial powers (Judicial Discretion), for conduct of third parties constitute an unconstitutional violation of Free speech protections?

Q4 - Does Judicial altering of witness testimony to comply with discretionary pre-trial judicial orders that limit the scope of petitioner 's triable issues violate First Amendment rights?

Q5- Does the use of summary judgment infringe upon the Sixth Amendment, effectively stripping litigants of their constitutional right to a fair jury trial by bypassing the jury 's role in fact-finding, imposing unfair and premature procedural burdens on litigants, and therefore making the process prone to judicial overreach?

Q6- Did The Court Abuse It's Discretion By Granting Summary Judgment?

Q7- Did Trial Court Deny Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights?

Q8- Are public court fees generally an unconstitutional barrier to justice, violating due process, equal protection, and Sixth Amendment rights?

Q9* Do financial barriers created by court-mandated prerequisites in the litigation process conflict with due process guarantees?

QIO Does requiring expert testimony as a prerequisite for proceeding on certain claims result in an undue burden that constitutes an unconstitutional barrier to fair trial rights under due process protections?

Qll- Is review and remand warranted by this court when constitutional rights were compromised in the procedural phase, thus preventing a trial on the merits?

Does the exercise of judicial discretion violate constitutional guarantees such as due process, equal protection, impartiality, and the right to a jury trial?