Did the failure by the Kentucky Supreme Court to adjudicate the claims of error challenging the two murder convictions deny Anthony of his right to a ruling on the merits of his appeal violating Due process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment; and if so, in this specific instance are Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) 21A.060 and SCR 1.020(l)(a) unconstitutional as applied to Anthony?

Did the trial court's failure to honor the law of the case doctrine and disregard for the writ of prohibition which allow the Commonwealth to preview alternative perpetrator evidence and subpoena and question witnesses under oath prior to trial deny Anthony of his right to present a complete defense and interfere with defense counsel's ability to make strategic decisions result in a structural error?

Did the failure by the Kentucky Supreme Court to adjudicate the claims of error challenging the two murder convictions deny Anthony of his right to a ruling on the merits of his appeal violating Due process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment; and if so, in this specific instance are Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) 21A.060 and SCR 1.020(l)(a) unconstitutional as applied to Anthony?