No. 24-631
Magni Hamso, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as the Medical Director of the Idaho Division of Medicaid v. M. H., et al.
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: constitutional-law equal-protection heightened-scrutiny medicaid-coverage ninth-circuit sex-reassignment
Latest Conference:
2025-06-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a policy declining coverage for sexreassignment surgeries violates the Equal Protection Clause; and
2. Whether clearly established law as of July 2022 held that a policy declining coverage for sex-reassignment surgeries violates the Equal Protection Clause.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a policy declining coverage for sex-reassignment surgeries violates the Equal Protection Clause and whether clearly established law as of July 2022 held such a policy unconstitutional
Docket Entries
2025-08-01
Judgment Issued.
2025-06-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of United States v. Skrmetti, 605 U. S. ___ (2025).
2025-06-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-02-25
Reply of Dr. Magni Hamso submitted.
2025-02-25
Reply of petitioner Dr. Magni Hamso filed. (Distributed)
2025-02-06
Brief of M.H. and T.B. in opposition submitted.
2025-02-06
Brief of respondents M. H., et al. in opposition filed.
2025-01-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 6, 2025.
2025-01-02
Motion of M.H. and T.B. for an extension of time submitted.
2025-01-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 8, 2025 to February 6, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 8, 2025)
Attorneys
Dr. Magni Hamso
Alan Michael Hurst — Idaho Office of the Attorney General, Petitioner
M.H. and T.B.
Howard A. Belodoff — Law Office of Howard A. Belodoff, PLLC, Respondent