Does the Florida State Court have the authority to convict a defendant in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel under Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), Hamilton v. Alabama, 541 U.S. 77 (2004), Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938), and other precedent which the Court has established that assistance of counsel in capital decisions in Gideon, to Miranda, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and Hamm v. North Carolina, 407 U.S. 25 (1972) supports defendant's right to counsel, but sufficient defendant would be convicted without the assistance of counsel after a grand jury indictment for the accused and a trial in the lower court where the voter imprisoned without invoking constitutional proceedings since voter with a direct bias.

Question not identified.

Whether the Florida Supreme Court has the authority to review a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel after a direct appeal when the claim was not raised in the initial post-conviction proceeding