1. Whether, in reviewing Mr. Fisher's conviction for possession of ammunition as a convicted felon under 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 924 (a)(2), the Panel's decision conflicted with Rehaif v. United States, Rehaif v. United States, 588 U.S. 225 (2019) since it affirmed without any evidence in the record to show that Mr. Fisher knew a deferred judgment qualified as a "conviction" for purposes of the federal firearms and ammunition restriction?

Whether the Panel's decision conflicted with Rehaif v. United States by affirming a conviction without evidence that the defendant knew a deferred judgment qualified as a 'conviction' for federal firearms restrictions