A: Did the Supreme court of California in error, abuse discretion and show bias in denying Petition (S286777 )
on Nov 13 24 and application for stay and left unresolved conflicted issue of law and factual issue? (violation
of 7th,5th, 1st,4th and 14th amendment) ? (opinion attached as Exhibit A)

B: Did 5th district court was in error, bias or abuse discretion when it gave opinion of denying appeal in a case
No: F085852 on 7 30 24 (Appeal was taken from the case vcu276991 denying motion for a new trial and
failing to declare mistrial on ex parte basis on March 21 23-).( opinion attached as Exhibit B)

C: Did Tulare court in error or abuse discretion denying motion for a new trial and failing to declare mistrial on
ex parte basis on March 21 23? (Exhibit D, See copy of ruling on record on appeal pgs 5573-5575,5495)

D: Did Tulare superior court in error or abuse discretion when entering judgment after the jury verdict on feb
15 23 based on erroneous jury verdict and was Jury is in error or abuse discretion when returned with the
verdict that is not supported by the sufficient evidence and found the defendant not found liable for all or any
causes of actions in the operative complaint on Feb 10 23?( Exhibit C)

E: Did Tulare superior court was in error and abused discretion in releasing numerous attorneys of the
plaintiff ?(see also record on appeal 2464)

F: Did judge Hillman show bias, made an error and abused discretion when failed to disqualify or recuse
himself ? .(see record on appeal pgs 3719-3731, 3671-3712)

G: Did this honorable judge Hillman be in error and abuse discretion for granting motion for mental
examination for appellant claim when , when no good cause presented , no relevancy or specific facts
justifying discovery. Knowing Plaintiff has opposed entering into such an exam?(see record on appeal 823
and 824, see line 7 page 824)

H: Did this honorable judge Hillman make an error and abuse discretion for granting motion for mental
examination for the justification to gauge the extent and nature of Plaintiffs emotional distress claim, but
utilized it for pretextual purposes to discredit court witness?(see record on appeal pgs 883-892)

I: Did Tulare Court make an error and abuse discretion in making a ruling to motion in limine?(see record on
appeal pgs 4639)

J: Did Tulare court be in error and abuse discretion when vacating the trial on june 9 21? (see record on
appeal pg 2023,2050-2072)

K: Did Tulare court be in error and abuse discretion when admitted Defendant's Exhibits. #102.102.125. #126.
and #127,128129 and 130 into evidence during the trial Feb 09 23. (record on appeal 5321 Minutes order
: Court Trial: Long Cause).

L: Did Tulare court be in error and abuse discretion when failed to recognize, prevent or in fact support
organized effort of whistle blower retaliation, witness intimidation to discredit plaintiff testimony , staying trial ,
disc

Whether the California Supreme Court and lower courts committed procedural errors and showed bias in multiple stages of a legal proceeding involving multiple alleged judicial and procedural violations