No. 24-6246
Benny Roe Stewart v. Jim Salmonsen, Warden
IFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge due-process equal-protection montana-statute sentencing-court subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2025-03-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. The validity of Montana Statute M.C.A. (46-22-101) (1) and
M.C.A. (46-22-101 (2) is drawn in question on the ground of its
being repugnant to the Constitution, or laws of the United States
whenever lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is raised against
the sentencing court, which violates:
2. Due Process of the law
3. Equal Protection of the law.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Montana Statute M.C.A. (46-22-101) violates constitutional due process and equal protection when subject matter jurisdiction is challenged
Docket Entries
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2024-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2025)
Attorneys
Benny Roe Stewart
Benny Stewart — Petitioner