No. 24-6240

Jarrell Raeshon Bordeaux v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-01-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: co-conspirator-testimony conspiracy-evidence constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admissibility
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

Do Federal Corridor Caquitainments ony Courts Yn Opracniesy ytorrnantn?

Shola Gorrdoorabion Caquiramentss Ye implenanted into lass, \n anger ok Se Loran) crisis?

DA Cork allo Gears do Mdleha Due Yocess due to lode o& Gadesol Leod Wwe!

Does Yours Qreovt Mobs Qeacadent in Comsprract Comiero udrace Ware ate a0 Co-Consprrackors?

Dox Qptarrmansty ove As Pole a Conspiracy eristed, wo, WWsndor\(S) oar Non Conkrdonsall worman'ff aognighe Bip dark err in denial o& defense ust yenlgatery aware?

Dip Coork ee in Nowe] odes widen Wd Cosrk ect ia downs eoolWhe Conspiracy aridenca?

We Cour RapIw Gatrona Lotti yy vimana of coon?

Dood Chypr boot vanspor , Nanantl, Grayder dskorton§ 'in US. Aa?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the court's interpretation of conspiracy evidence and co-conspirator testimony violate due process rights in criminal proceedings?

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2025)

Attorneys

Jarrell Raeshon Bordeaux
Jarrell Raeshon Bordeaux — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent