No. 24-6239

Charles Randy Bowlds, Jr. v. Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2025-01-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review counsel-waiver criminal-procedure due-process supreme-court-precedent tenth-circuit
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-03-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals approached this matter of first impression, re-appointment of counsel after a valid waiver of counsel, in a manner that was in contradiction with clearly established Supreme Court and Tenth Circuit precedence.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals erred in its approach to re-appointment of counsel after a valid waiver of counsel, potentially contradicting established Supreme Court and Tenth Circuit precedent

Docket Entries

2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2024-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2025)

Attorneys

Charles Randy Bowlds
Charles Randy Bowlds — Petitioner
Charles Randy Bowlds Jr. — Petitioner