No. 24-6233
Dearick Smith v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: auer-deference circuit-split judicial-review kisor-standard sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether this Court's holding in Kisor v. Wilkie, 588 U.S. 558 (2019) applies to the United States Sentencing Guidelines; and
2. If so, whether a sentencing court errs in deferring to the commentary of U.S.S.G. § 2E1.1, over and above the plain language of U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(1).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court's holding in Kisor v. Wilkie applies to the United States Sentencing Guidelines and whether a sentencing court errs in deferring to Guidelines commentary over plain language
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-13
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-12-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2025)
Attorneys
Dearick Smith
Matthew Whitney Brissenden — Matthew W. Brissenden, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent