No. 24-6229

Terrell Jason Armstrong v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-01-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-claims district-court eighth-circuit evidentiary-hearing ineffective-assistance
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the district court erred in summarily denying an
evidentiary hearing on claims that trial counsel was
constitutionally ineffective for failing to call two prepared defense
witnesses whose testimony was central to the defense.

2. Whether the standard for granting a COA under 28 U.S.C. §
2253(c), as clarified in Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2003),
was misapplied by the Eighth Circuit, thereby precluding
meaningful appellate review of substantial constitutional claims.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in summarily denying an evidentiary hearing on claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and whether the Eighth Circuit misapplied the standard for granting a Certificate of Appealability

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-13
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-11-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2025)

Attorneys

Terrell Jason Armstrong
Terrell Jason Armstrong — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent