No. 24-6206
Anthony Bowden, Sr. v. Office of Personnel Management
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law disability-discrimination due-process federal-employment merit-system-protection-board reasonable-accommodation
Key Terms:
ERISA
ERISA
Latest Conference:
2025-04-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was Federal Appeals Court opinion to confirm the Merit System Protection Board (MSPB) decision in the Bowden vs. OPM case discrimination against a person with a disability?
2. Was Mr. Bowden taken advantage of due to his mental disability by Federal Appeals Court by his arguments being disregarded and ruled as being non persuasive?
3. Was Mr. Bowden given any accommodations due to his mental and physical disability cause by federal on-the-job injuries?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Merit System Protection Board's decision discriminated against a person with a disability and disregarded Mr. Bowden's arguments due to mental and physical impairments
Docket Entries
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-17
Petitioner complied with order of February 24, 2025.
2025-02-24
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 17, 2025, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2025-02-12
Letter and supplemental appendix of petitioner received.
2025-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-16
Waiver of right of respondent Office of Personnel Management to respond filed.
2024-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 27, 2025)
Attorneys
Anthony Bowden
Anthony Bowden Sr. — Petitioner
Office of Personnel Management
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent