1. DID THE MAJORITY BELOW ERROR IN NOT APPLYING THIS COURT'S DECISION IN SCHULP V. DELO, TO HOLD THAT PETITIONER COMPELLING NEW EVIDENCE, THAT PRESENTS A COLORABLE CLAIM OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE, CREATE TWO CONFLICTS OF LAW, BY THE PANEL'S IMPOSSIBLE "ACTUAL INNOCENCE" STANDARD?

2. DID THE SIX CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERROR WHEN THEY DID NOT PROVIDE A HEARING EN BANC, WHEN A PANEL OF TWO OF THREE JUDGES RULED CONTRARY TO UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT LAW, ESTABLISHING NEW LAW, DENYING MR. HUBBARD'S ACTUAL INNOCENCE GATEWAY CLAIM?

Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in not applying Schulp v. Del© precedent and denying petitioner's actual innocence gateway claim despite compelling new evidence