1. HAVING OBTAINED FAVORABLE NEW DNA RESULTS VIA POSTCONVICTION DNA TESTING, IS PETITIONER ENTITLED TO
EQUITABLE TOLLING UNDER HOLLAND V. FLORIDA, 560 U.S. 631
(2010) ON A FIRST FEDERAL HABEAS PETITION?

2. UNDER MAPPLE V. OHIO, 360 U.S. 264 (1959), DO NEW DNA TEST
RESULTS THAT PROVE PETITIONER'S CONVICTION WAS
PREDICATED UPON A FALSE CONFESSION REQUIRE REVERSAL OF
THE CONVICTIONS OR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING?

3. DO SCIENTIFIC AND LEGAL ADVANCEMENTS IN THE FIELDS OF
FALSE CONFESSION SCIENCE AND EDTA BLOOD TAMPERING
TESTING REQUIRE A NEW TRIAL WHEN THE JUDGE PRECLUDED
PETITIONER'S EXPERT WITNESSES ON THESE SUBJECTS AND
PREVENTED THE PRESENTATION OF A COMPLETE DEFENSE?

Whether a petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling on a first federal habeas petition based on new favorable DNA results and whether new DNA evidence proving a false confession requires reversal of convictions or an evidentiary hearing