1.) Was Te. AS840-35~-209 vinloted Yarough out the Odjudication of this Case?

2) Ts the Content of the Presentence report ascertainable, Without it being Scanned inte the Criminal Court's e-Filing System +o Comply wcth TN 20% District Court Rules of fractice Rule Gol?

3.) Did the state Commit a fraudulent act during Rettioner's Post - Conviction Proceeding by Fendering a doctored Fesentence Report that. the Criminal Courts electronic docket £ eport has no record of, +o refute petitioner's Claim that Counsel Was Theftective ot the Sentencing hearing foc Failing +p declare Q Mistrial due to the presentence report Containing Oo fecontation In the form of a victim impact Statement ?

4.) wos TCA.8 \O-1-2ot vidloted 2

5.) BY Does Anis cose bear the moderiol Components vended In quality foc celiet ovailable under Ye Scope OF FACie ule Gotb(a) ond Rule Gold) (3) Proceeding ?

6.) Do the makecial elements the cose Was ad judiented on luring Petition er's Past ~ Conviction Froceeding and 87754 Proceeding reflect upon the Criminal Couct's electronic. cecacd \N Fegords to the Content and Tiking dote. ot the Preseatenice ss) report with the Criminal Couct ?

7.) LY Does he omission of the Presentence report from the Criminal Court's electronic. cecord Constitute 0 Brody Vid lotion?

Does the omission of the presentence report from the Criminal Court's electronic docket constitute a Brady violation?