Whether an opening statement, counsel's failure to object to it, and the magnitude of the prosecutorial misconduct in the opening statement of a defendant's trial requires that their conviction be vacated. In essence, if the evidence is sufficiently strong, do defendants have a right to a fair trial?

What does the Court consider overwhelming evidence or sufficiently strong evidence?

Whether the timing of the challenged comments establishes that a defendant suffered presumptive prejudice?

Whether Appellate Court erred in overlooking the District Court's statement of only questions presented (T-TD)'s involvement to amples every subsiding question tacitly included.

If and when the Petition is granted, due to the importance of the factual issues, Neels respectfully requests for oral arguments before this Honorable Court.

Whether a federal district court's denial of a habeas petition based on procedural grounds constitutes a violation of the defendant's constitutional rights when evidence potentially exculpatory was not fully considered